Available 24 Hours
★★★★★ 4.5/5
- Effective Protection
- Data Privacy
- Cloud System
- Real Time Reporting
In today’s digital economy, trust is earned through evidence. Customers, partners, and enterprises no longer rely on promises or policy statements. They expect verifiable proof that your cybersecurity controls work consistently, not just on paper, but in real operations. This is exactly what SOC 2 Type 2 is designed to demonstrate.
Shield Identity helps organizations get SOC 2 Type 2 through a cybersecurity-led, audit-ready approach that focuses on operational reality, not cosmetic compliance. We help you prepare, validate, and sustain SOC 2 Type 2 in a way that strengthens security, reduces audit risk, and builds long-term credibility with stakeholders.
SOC 2 Type 2 evaluates whether your controls related to security, availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, and privacy are operating effectively over a defined period of time. Unlike SOC 2 Type 1, which assesses design at a single point, Type 2 tests how your organization actually functions day after day.
To get SOC 2 Type 2, your organization must demonstrate that cybersecurity controls are consistently followed, properly governed, and supported by reliable evidence. This includes access management, change management, incident handling, monitoring, vendor oversight, and security governance. Auditors are not looking for perfect systems. They are looking for controls that are realistic, repeatable, and defensible.
Many organizations treat SOC 2 Type 2 as a documentation project. This approach almost always leads to friction, delays, and audit findings. SOC 2 Type 2 exposes weaknesses in how cybersecurity is actually practiced, not how it is described.
Common challenges include controls that exist but are not enforced, security tasks performed inconsistently, unclear ownership across teams, and evidence scattered across tools and vendors. These are cybersecurity maturity issues, not formatting issues. A successful SOC 2 Type 2 outcome depends on aligning people, processes, and technology into a coherent cybersecurity operating model.
Shield Identity approaches SOC 2 Type 2 from this exact perspective.
Our service is designed to support organizations before, during, and through the audit period, while improving real cybersecurity posture.
We start with a focused readiness assessment to evaluate how your cybersecurity controls align with SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, covering control design, operating effectiveness, evidence availability, and priority risk areas.
Instead of adding controls, we align SOC 2 requirements with real business operations, removing overlap and ensuring controls are practical, sustainable, and consistently executed during the audit period.
SOC 2 Type 2 depends on evidence. We define required evidence, ownership, frequency, and storage to reduce last-minute effort and improve consistency across cybersecurity and compliance activities.
When gaps are identified, we provide clear, practical remediation guidance that helps teams implement fixes that hold up under audit scrutiny without disrupting daily operations.
Throughout the observation period, we support control execution with targeted check-ins, evidence reviews, and exception guidance to maintain audit readiness and avoid escalation.
We assist with auditor communications by clarifying responses and managing follow-ups efficiently, keeping discussions focused, reducing fatigue, and minimizing unnecessary audit cycles.
This service is well suited for organizations that operate in data-driven or cloud-based environments and are subject to increasing security scrutiny. It is especially relevant for SaaS companies, technology vendors, fintech firms, and service providers selling into enterprise or regulated markets.
If your sales cycles include security reviews, if customers request assurance reports, or if cybersecurity trust influences buying decisions, SOC 2 Type 2 is a strategic requirement rather than a compliance formality.
Shield Identity treats SOC 2 Type 2 as a cybersecurity discipline, focusing on how controls operate in real environments and remain effective, repeatable, and auditable over time.
We combine hands-on cybersecurity experience with audit awareness, translating operational security practices into clear, defensible evidence that auditors can assess without friction or repeated clarification.
We avoid generic templates and unnecessary controls, aligning SOC 2 Type 2 requirements to your business model, risk profile, and operational reality without creating administrative overhead.
Beyond the audit report, organizations gain stronger control ownership, consistent execution, reduced audit risk, and a cybersecurity foundation that supports trust, growth, and long-term resilience.
Getting SOC 2 Type 2 means demonstrating that your cybersecurity and operational controls are not only designed properly, but also operate effectively over a defined audit period, typically six to twelve months.
SOC 2 Type 1 evaluates control design at a single point in time, while SOC 2 Type 2 assesses whether those controls consistently operate over time, making it a stronger cybersecurity assurance.
The timeline depends on readiness and audit period length. Most organizations require several weeks of preparation followed by a six to twelve month observation period before the final SOC 2 Type 2 report.
SOC 2 Type 2 is not a certification but an independent assurance report. It focuses heavily on cybersecurity controls, governance, and operational discipline, making it a key trust signal for customers and partners.
SOC 2 Type 2 commonly evaluates access management, monitoring, incident response, change management, vendor risk, and security governance, with emphasis on consistent execution and supporting evidence.
Many SaaS and technology companies need SOC 2 Type 2 to meet enterprise customer expectations, shorten sales cycles, and demonstrate mature cybersecurity practices when handling sensitive or regulated data.
Preparing for SOC 2 Type 2 strengthens cybersecurity by enforcing consistent control execution, clearer ownership, better evidence management, and governance practices that continue well beyond the audit.
Got any Suggestion or Question? Leave us a Message. We will reply ASAP